van der Waals radius
Our study of limonene showed that atoms do not approach
each other closely when they are not bonded to each other. This
suggests that atoms in different molecules cannot approach each
other closely either and must occupy a well-defined molecular volume.
One way to measure molecular volumes is to study gas
behavior over a range of temperatures. Real gases do not perfectly
obey the ‘ideal’ gas law (PV = nRT), and deviations
between ‘ideal’ and real behavior can give information
about molecular volume.
It is also possible to measure intermolecular distances
if a compound can be crystallized. One can pass X-rays through a
crystalline solid and detect the X-rays when they emerge. The “bounce
angle” gives information about atom positions, and one can
use these data to calculate all kinds of interatomic distances.
Whatever its source, intermolecular distance data
are interpreted by viewing the atoms as hard spheres. We assume
that the spheres of neighboring nonbonded atoms just touch,
so that the measured interatomic distance equals the sum of the
atomic hard-sphere radii:
Hard-sphere radii are more commonly called van der
Waals radii (or nonbonded radii). Reliable values cannot be given
for these radii because they depend on the measuring technique and
the molecule, but I have listed one useful set of radii in the following
table.
van der Waals radii (in Å)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
1.7 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
1.35 |
1.9 |
1.85 |
1.8 |
These radii, like the bond radii discussed above,
correlate with position in the Periodic Table:
|
-
As we go left to right within a row,
van der Waals radius shrinks slightly (example:
C > N > O > F)
-
As we go top to bottom within a column,
van der Waals radius expands (example: F << Cl <
Br < I)
|
Van der Waals radii can be used to study nonbonded
(especially intermolecular) interactions. For example, one can compare
an actual nonbonded distance with a predicted distance (the latter
is obtained by summing van der Waals radii). If there is a “prediction
gap”, that is, if the actual distance is substantially shorter
than the predicted one, we might claim that some special force draws
the atoms (molecules) together. We can also try to correlate the
magnitude of this “prediction gap” with the strength
of this attractive force.
This kind of analysis must be undertaken carefully
because atoms are not hard spheres (they are squishy). It is also
possible for another force to draw nonbonded atoms together. For
example, we have seen that X-C-Y nonbonded distances are much shorter
than X-C…C-Y nonbonded distances. X-C-Y distances are also
much shorter than r(X) + r(Y), where r = van der Waals radius. The
large “prediction gap” does not mean that X and Y attract
each other, however. A much more likely explanation is that C forces
X and Y to approach each other in order to make CX and CY bonds.
|